FAQs TAP0016 User manual

Brand: FAQs

Model: TAP0016

Type: User manual

FAQs TAP0016

The TAP0016 is a versatile and powerful tool that allows for lossless and secure transfer of data between computers through a cable connection. With its USB 3.0 interface and transfer speeds of up to 5 Gbps, the TAP0016 ensures rapid and efficient data movement. The device supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it compatible with a wide range of computers. Additionally, the TAP0016 is compact and portable, allowing for easy transport and use in various settings.

FAQs TAP0016

Taiko Audio Extreme Router - FAQ

For the Product Manual, please see the “Taiko Audio Extreme Router Guide” that can be

downloaded from the Downloads page on the Taiko Audio website: https://taikoaudio.com/taiko-

2020/taiko-audio-downloads

Above is a photo of the Taiko Router PCB.

Q&A

Topics in Blue are included in the interactive Richpanel FAQ Section on Taikoaudio.com

Can we keep the existing house router/wifi access point and use the Taiko router in series and

create an audio-exclusive connection to the hifi system for best sound?

Yes, you can indeed.

So, you can just use your house wifi?

Indeed.

Should the Taiko Switch and Router be used in series? Or just one vs the other?

They should indeed be used in series, the Router feeding the Switch.

Is the Router made from a solid copper billet?

Indeed, it is. We are slowly but surely moving towards 100% in house manufacturing to get rid of

external supplier dependencies as those have become increasingly “troublesome”. We don’t want

our own anodizing facility hence the choice to move away from Aluminum as a base material.

Copper is a material which we can finish ourselves (over time), we have years of experience working

with it by now, and as a bonus, the material has an arguably “higher-end” look and feel.

Do these cases provide full Faraday shield insulation?

They come as close as you can get for an electronic appliance.

I have the service provider fiber going into the Fiber modem, then a RJ45 cable to the

router/switch. Does the new router accept the service provider fiber directly? Or will I still need a

fiber modem before the Taiko router?

The Taiko Router could accept the service provider fiber directly. Subsequently, you could create a

separated audio and rest-of-home network. Alternatively, it could also be placed behind the fiber

modem. However, we recommend using copper.

For those of us that use an Edge router with our ATT (AT&T) setup, will the Taiko router replace or

be an addition to the network chain?

Initially, the Taiko Router will be an addition.

Does the router also have to be near the Switch, like the case for Switch to Extreme?

No, it can be placed anywhere.

Power Switch or Router from the upcoming BPS?

It would be much more beneficial to power the switch from the BPS than the router. We’re assuming

the switch being placed close to the Extreme and the router at a distance, likely where your internet

enters your home. But this is not the only possible scenario.

Does the Taiko router also work as a modem?

For now, it does not. But it has the potential to possible be deployed that way at a later stage.

Depending on your definition of modem, yes, but your service provider needs to permit and support

using your own router.

Does the Taiko router also work without wifi?

We will prep the Router for Port Forwarding to allow using tablets via your regular Access Point but

that does perform less well than the built-in wifi.

Can we use the router instead of the switch? In other words, does the router do everything the

switch does, and more?

No, they serve different purposes.

Are you going to do some testing with the major ISPs in each region to see which work with your

router? (in case one wants to replace the existing AP with the Taiko Router)

Unfortunately, this is not realistically executable. Also, this is premature and for potential future

purpose. Our current configuration is to use the Taiko Router in series, after the main router/wifi

access point.

Since my ISP's Router also works for TV services, I need to place the Taiko Router after my ISP's

Router. In this case, would we make a LAN-to-LAN connection with the Taiko Router's DHCP

services disabled, or a LAN-to-WAN connection creating a second network for audio only?

Creating a second network for audio only would give you the maximum uplift in Sound Quality. This

yields much quieter backgrounds, undisturbed by network traffic generated by other persons in the

household.

Can you rank the various Taiko products by order of magnitude of improvement of the sound

quality?

The Taiko Audio Extreme Switch is the star of the "show". In order of impact as things are today:

1) Switch

2) XDMS

3) Router

4) Network card + Interconnect

But it's a tight race between 1) and 2).

Is there any sonic advantage to have the router and the switch in separate boxes? If not, could you

possibly offer a one-box router-switch so we eliminate one cable and possibly one external power

supply?

Unfortunately, yes there is an advantage to having separate boxes. If you want just one box, we

recommend picking the switch.

Although we can have separate networks assigned within the Taiko router, will it still be better to

have a separate ISP Fiber and modem to fully isolate traffic?

This can actually turn out negative. For obtaining a degree of separation, you could place the

modem, router, and switches on a separate mains system. But if you're splitting a single phase with

a common neutral it's not going to matter that much.

Which of RJ45 or Fiber would work best with the Taiko router?

RJ45 is preferred but both work well.

What are the rated speeds of the Router’s RJ45 ports?

1Gbps (but the RJ45 ports also work with 100Mb connections)

What is the rated speed of the Router’s SFP ports?

1Gb (incompatible with 100Mb connections)

Why do the SFP ports only work with 1Gb?

SFP modules and -ports are designed for a single speed and they do not exist in a dual-speed

configuration. The SFP modules and ports that we use in our Taiko Audio products are specified to

work only at 1Gb.

As a result, the following Taiko Audio products will not work with 100mb connections, only with 1Gb

connections:

• Extreme Switch

• Extreme Network Card

Conversely, RJ45 ports can work in 100Mb and 1Gb mode. As a result, the Taiko Audio Extreme

Router will be partially compatible with 100Mb and 1Gb connections:

• Extreme Router RJ45 ports: 100Mb and 1Gb

• Extreme Router SFP/DAC port: 1Gb only

What this means is that any network interfaces upstream of the Taiko Audio Extreme Switch or

Network Card, such as generic routers or switches, must be 1 Gb. For the Taiko Audio Extreme

Router, the same holds true where it concerns devices connected to its SFP/DAC port.

Please note that some Ethernet cables are restricted to 100Mbit (as opposed to Gigabit) which will

also be incompatible.

Will the Router work with a MESH satellite router such as the Asus zenwifi? Will it meet the 1GB

requirement?

The Extreme Router accepts either 100Mb or 1Gb on its RJ45 ports, so as long as the Extreme Router

is used upstream of the Switch and NIC, the setup will work.

Is there a chance to add second SFP port in router?

No, that is not necessary. The benefit OF SFP is a reduction of the switch power consumption by

switching out a RJ45 port for SFP DAC which is the dominant form of noise generation in this switch

design. What happens before is much less relevant in this area. The Router is designed to work

optimally as it is with the partial isolation a rj45 input provides from a “noisier” upstream

environment being beneficial in this case.

Will the Taiko Router support creating a V-LAN upon installation?

Yes, this is indeed supported.

Within a voltage range, what is the best voltage?

The largest variation in that would be caused by a linear Power Supply. For a LPS, a higher voltage

might be better as most are noisier at higher currents (and lower voltages).

If 12V is optimal for the Switch (which is its minimum recommended voltage), would 7V also be

best for the Router, given that’s its lowest recommended voltage?

The issue here is the LPS. Both the Switch and Router are very power conversion efficient (~99%).

That means that if the power consumption would be 12 watts (just as an easy example), the current

draw would be 1A as voltage*current=power. If you use a 7V supply the current would go up to 1.7A

(12W divided by 7V = 1.7A). Typically, higher current = higher noise in a linear regulator, but there's

more to it than that. A LPS is not a very power efficient supply. As a commercial manufacturer you

would not typically use a different transformer for each different output voltage. Perhaps you'd use

a 15V AC secondary transformer which supplies about 21V DC after rectification (+/- 10% to account

for wall voltage variations) for 15V and 12V out after regulation, in a LPS the excess voltage is

discarded, transformed into heat, increasing the current draw from your power grid, and the current

spikes for recharging the capacitor bank which is also a type of noise, the more inefficient it is (the

more power is transformed to heat) the worse this gets. So, it just depends on the LPS design which

voltage will perform best. As 12V is a very common voltage you could assume those to be relative

efficient designs, but in the above example with a 15V AC transformer secondary the 15V LPS could

perform "better". Now if a manufacturer uses the same transformer for a 5V, 7V and 9V supply, the

9V would be most efficient. Therefor it's impossible to give you an exact recommendation without

knowing the design specifics of the LPS as the Switch and Router really don't care much which

voltage is supplied as long as it's in range.

Is it true that some audiophile cables do not work with the Taiko NIC and Switch?

Cables that are restricted to 100Mbit (as opposed to Gigabit) can indeed cause certain issues.

Although reducing the network speed to 100Mbit is a strategy employed by some "Audiophile"

switches with a school of thought that lower speed translates to lower noise this is not the Taiko

way. Further to this, many “unexplained” Roon problems, like sudden stops during playback are

caused by 100Mbit network speeds and solved by moving up to 1Gb, with a vast decrease in error

messages in Roon's logs. For XDMS, the negative impact on SQ by running at 100Mbit is very

obvious. Therefore, we do not support 100Mbit networks, but we do support diagnosing and curing

the cause of running a 100Mbit network.

100Mbit versus Gigabit Switches – what’s better?

if you look at it from a design / component perspective, 1Gb switches are much more modern /

advanced / further developed, and can actually end up consuming less power overall than

antiquated 100Mbit switch chips. Our switch only uses 1.3 watts with DAC cables? We did not have

much success with 10Gb though, that just uses way more power, runs much hotter and is very

difficult to get to sound right.

RJ45 or DAC?

We prefer DAC for ultimate neutrality, transparency and imaging precision. RJ45 is a close second

above Glass. Some people prefer a degree of “smoothing” which makes a case for using RJ45 that

can sound more pleasurable and reduce harder edges caused elsewhere in the system compared to

DAC.

Is the customized QoS rule of the router important?

Yes, virtually all settings matter.

I will replace my current switch (before the Extreme) with the Taiko switch. Should I also remove

the subnet (Edge Router x) before that?

Yes, the Taiko router should be able to do everything the Edge Router x does. However, there are

some ISP devices that will prohibit direct one-on-one replacement. In that case, you can add the

Taiko Router after the ISP Router.

Will the router and switch also be made available for non-Extreme users?

Never say never, but initially, the Taiko Audio Router will be available only to Extreme owners. With

some adjustments it's possible for non-Extreme owners to use but it will not give the full benefit,

which includes a software / firmware interaction. As it stands, it was quite a challenge to secure

enough parts to be able to supply one to each current Extreme owner and have a few spares for

future ones.

With the Taiko router in place, is there still a benefit to isolating the audio Wi-Fi AP with fiber

optic?

Not in the cases that we have tried it.

Copper or Fiber Networks? I have two separate internet services in my home, one is fiber, going to

the Audio Network, and one is copper, going the home network, so they are completely isolated.

In this case, which option should be better:

a) Program (if possible) the Taiko router in order to use it directly with the fiber input

b) Keep the current fiber modem and router, and place the Taiko router in series

In this case, it doesn’t matter much. Although we do significantly prefer rj45 into the router though

so we would probably end up recommending b) for that reason.

Will it be possible add two sets of rules to the Router?

The first set of rules : complete isolation. The second set of rules : allows access to the HiFi

network from the Home network. The goal being to backup the music files and the Roon library

from the Extreme to a NAS located in the home network and to access the Extreme's Roon server

from a machine on the home network to allow managing Roon settings and library from a desktop

machine.

We can add VNC and filesharing port forwarding rules, but keep in mind less is more for SQ. We are

contemplating implementing VNC and file share access port forwarding, preconfigured by default.

The Extreme could be assigned a permanent IP address, always the same, on all routers. That adds

the benefit of decreasing support load for us. Your VNC / file share access IP address from your

home network would then become the IP address assigned to the Taiko router by your home

network router.

If I play local files from a NAS, the NAS will connect to Taiko router. Will it compromise sound

quality?

Yes, a better solution would be to connect an USB drive to one of the Router’s two USB A ports

which can then serve as a NAS.

Can the Taiko Router server as a NAS?

It has built-in NAS functionality by means of external USB drive. Generally, it is best to use fewer

power supplies, so bus powered would potentially be ideal, although we have not ran extensive

comparisons yet. The best solution would probably be powering it from the DC distributor but that

would typically run at 12V and most external USB drives run at 5V.

Currently, I have dedicated for audio ISP service (fiber) with modem and Router. Home is on

totally separate Service with its own modem and router. Could I use just one ISP service, one

modem and one router when using Taiko router and the SQ will be same as on totally separated

chains?

The Sound Quality should be roughly the same indeed.

I use a separate computer (MacBook Pro) to copy CDs to the Extreme SSD and then copy to an NAS

for backup. I do not use the NAS for playback. Is SQ still affected by having the MacBook Pro and

NAS connected to the Taiko router?

Yes, as they will then increase network activity on the “audio” network. Every powered-on device

connected to a network creates network activity. Most mobile devices, like iPhones, iPads or

Android devices even create network activity in “standby / screen switched off” mode. If you power

off your MacBook Pro during music playback it should not generate network activity, but your NAS

will for sure.

At what minimum distance should the wifi AP be placed?

We don’t think the “airborne” part of Wi-Fi impacts anything. It’s more the power side of it which

can cause some “discomfort”. So, the placement is arbitrary.

Is wifi noise not an issue?

There is most definitely a very significant impact of “wifi pollution”. But the consensus here currently

is that the negative effect is likely not caused by a router’s 2.4/5/6Ghz radio function. In our

experiments, anything below 2-3MHz affects sound by not yet fully understood mechanisms. Above

that, it does nothing audible. A wifi access point does use a variety of high efficiency switchers

emitting pollution in this range, 500-700KHz is a very common range for example.

What about WAP?

The router will not provide WAP

How would you compare the impact of adding the router (along with isolating the Extreme on its

own network) on top of the switch to the effect we experienced with just adding the switch and

network card?

Although they impact sound quality in different ways, we feel the distribution is as follows.

Setting 100% improvement as a baseline (actual improvement subject to your perception), Network

card and Switch combined 60%, Router 40%, drilling down further, Network card 20%, Switch 40%,

Router 40%.

This however does not include the new Extreme DC power distributor, which allows you to power

both Switch and Router from one single power supply with significant improved performance over

using 2 power supplies with the additional option to tailor the sound to your personal preference.

It was mentioned previously that ports would be forwarded eg. for VNC to copy files. Will there

also be port forwarding for XDMS, so I can control my music from my Macbook while still being

connected to the main (non-audio) router, which I need for accessing the internet?

With our recent breakthrough in finding a solution to add wifi to the router without sonic sacrifices

(rather the inverse), port forwarding is no longer needed, as the control point/tablet simply connects

to the Extreme server directly. However, we will prep the Router for Port Forwarding so that you can

still use the Extreme as you're used to, using your home wifi, using Roon, XDMS, VNC, Teamviewer

and file sharing.

Would network noise be more prevalent in congested areas such as apartment complexes, cities,

developed areas? Or is network noise inherent no matter what?

I think we've all been conditioned into believing in something which does in fact not exist. There's no

such thing as "internet noise" traveling through your home router. There's noise caused BY activity

due to the need to process more network packets, more processing means more noise in the device

performing the processing. Naturally there's download speed, where it takes a longer or shorter

time to receive the requested data, which translates into longer lower intensity processing, or

shorter higher intensity processing, creating a different noise spectrum.

More Processing Means More Noise?

Adding the switch reduces processing in the Extreme, adding the router reduces processing in both

the switch and the extreme.

Isn’t a wall-wart power supply good enough for the Taiko Switch and Router?

It is only good enough to get you started. We strongly recommend using a LPS. 1 LPS powering

switch and router, when using a DAC cable as the interconnect, “sounds” better then 2, even more

so when using the DC distributor.

Will a second Taiko Router obviate the need for a good quality LPS?

Unfortunately, no.

Is port forwarding (on the Taiko Router) the preferred method to enable the iPad to control the

Extreme wirelessly?

Previously yes, currently no longer. Onboard wifi is now preferred.

Will port forwarding cause lag with XDMS?

Functionally, you won’t notice a difference.

What needs to be configured to make Port Forwarding function?

The Router will be preconfigured for port forwarding. (you may need to change a setting), then

move the ethernet cable from switch to router and insert the DAC cable between router and switch,

and that’s it.

Is it going to be the general recommendation that the router connect to the switch via a DAC

cable?

For ultimate “neutrality” and in the large majority of use cases, yes, but it works great with rj45 as

well.

Is there a clear preference between RJ45 or DAC cable to connect the Router to the Switch, when

the they are on their own individually-isolated Shunyata Denali receptacle, and all grounds are

connected to the ALTAIRA, and not using the DC Power Distributor?

In this particular use case, you may prefer RJ45. In that particular setup you may want to avoid

directly connecting the switch and router grounds with a DAC cable, even though it’s the superior

method of connection. If you use 2 power supplies there will be a noise voltage “riding” on the

ground connections between the connected devices. You can then try to reduce that by different

“grounding” schemes to try to get closer to single point grounding, but as these devices are both

externally powered you can simply achieve superior single point grounding by using 1 shared power

supply.

Is there any advantage for the dirty side router to have a VLAN for the Taiko router to connect and

run off of?

No, there is not.

Is it advisable to also connect product X to the Taiko Router, in addition to the Extreme?

it is advised not to connect anything else to the Taiko router. Not because the device may not

benefit itself, but because it may (and likely will) cause a degradation in the SQ of the Extreme. If you

leave the extra component connected and in standby, then it depends on what the ATVX generates

in standby and how much it, including its power supply “dumps” onto the network cabling.

Is there any provision to maintain Roon distribution for non-critical listening? With Roon’s

broadcast and multicast for discovery, Can Roon on a Taiko Extreme "talk" to the other devices on

the separate subnet?

This could be possible "with a pass-through" but this would need to be tested in several

configurations for SQ. However, the purpose of the Router is to decrease network traffic on an

“audio only” / “isolated” subnet. The more traffic you pass through, the less “useful” it becomes.

Would you recommend using one of the router’s USB ports to connect a USB/Ethernet converter if

an additional port is required? Wondering if this has an impact to SQ?

That will have an impact on sound quality, plus you’ll need to have driver support in the router for

that particular device.

It was stated that the length of DAC cable from switch to Extreme should be shortest useable

length. Does the same rule apply for a DAC cable from router to switch?

It’s not the biggest part of the equation. Shorter sounds a bit tighter, longer a bit fuller. We

recommend picking what’s convenient to use.

Would PoE (Power Over Ethernet) provide a cleaner solution, soundwise and aesthetically?

Unfortunately, no, most likely due to the buck boost converters those use. Perhaps if we specifically

design a PoE injector or a 54V powersupply but I don’t think that’s the best way to go.

Why not include the AP directly inside the router, with an external antenna?

If we can get good performance from that then we most certainly will do that as a dedicated “audio”

AP is absolutely better than routing your home hifi through the router.

Would adding an antenna require making a new version of the router?

No, the Router has 2 m.2 PCIe slots on board. Adding a cutout for an antenna is no problem.

There seems to be a SIM card slot on the left side of the board?

That slot is indeed for a SIM card, good to have options.

A 4G SIM in the Router’s SIM slot could allow for 100% isolation from the home network. Is this an

option?

Today, you could use any “low-powered” LTE/4G router (with modem build in) and connect to the

Extreme router to obtain the same advantage of isolation from the home network. LTE/4G router - -

Extreme router - - switch - - server. This has been tested some time ago but the router already

provides ample isolation from your home network.

Has a decision been made regarding the integration of an AP into the router in order to have an

all-in-one solution?

This is in the works.

Wifi to be added to the Router (updated implementation 25-05-2023)

We have integrated Wi-Fi working on the routers! This does require a PCB change to work well

which we are now considering to do for 2 reasons. The first one being guaranteed SQ performance,

and yes this is the solution which produces superior results, the second reason is reduced complexity

of setup, in fact it can be virtually as easy to install as the switch, and easier than the switch/network

card bundle.

The downside is the increased BOM (Bill Of Materials), and we already forgot to include a few items

in that meaning we will have to increase the Router price, likely to at least EURO 6600 and possibly a

bit more. But of course, we will honor the EURO 6000 presale price and those who placed presale

orders will get the wi-fi update for free.

Does this separate wifi network sound better than if I used port forwarding and stayed connected

to my main network?

Yes, it does.

Can the wi-fi feature in the future router be disabled?

Yes, it can be removed entirely.

Will you also issue a Router without wifi?

the Extreme Router will only be issued in its definitive form, which is with wifi access point included.

Alas, we will not make the earlier incarnation available to the public.

There was talk of Router Subscription/maintenance cost?

We switched to openwrt, no maintenance cost.

Why not combine Switch and Router in a single chassis?

The thing is EMI/RFI is airborne inside the chassis and can couple back into the circuit, of course you

could create 2 internal chambers, but this would both be about the same size / weight and actually a

bit more expensive, especially for post treatment / finishing and a higher change of transport

damage, especially since customs appears to like to unpack these frequently to check what that

massive blob is showing up on their Xrays.

In case of Extreme sever + Merging NADAC setup via Merging ASIO plugin and an Extreme

Network Card, where should the new Extreme Router be inserted?

The Router should be "in front of" the Extreme, like so: Router -> Extreme -> Switch -> Nadac

Will the router ap be Cat6 or Cat6e?

As things are looking now, neither. We have the following setup running which adds Wi-Fi over USB

at a very low power consumption.

We could integrate this inside the Router chassis, ideally adding an exclusive power

rail/filter/regulator. This is by far the best solution we’ve tested. We’re currently looking at what

that would entail and if we can make this work for the presale batch since it requires ordering new

PCBs (although we can recycle most of the expensive parts).

It looks like we can ship end of July with new PCBs. Wi-Fi would then be integrated into the Router

chassis and management interface. The SQ impact of this Wi-Fi solution is virtually undetectable.

Will the router wifi work with Android?

Yes

If I don’t listen to streaming, I can leave the taiko router unplugged from the main one, right? Will

there be any benefit (sonically) to that?

You could but we feel it’s not worth the hassle.

Is the reason why the router uses ARM 16 cores because the better the performance, the better

the sound?

CPU performance matters but there’s more to it than just that. Somewhat obvious is you want low

utilization so performance is minimally impacted by WAN side traffic and traffic rules processing like

port forwarding. But there’s more which went into the design of the router including the processor

selection which I’m afraid I cannot disclose to avoid being prematurely copied. Prematurely being

before we hit break-even on our R&D costs which might be like a year away. Disclosing this aspect of

the design would take away most of the mystery surrounding the effects of ethernet networking so

I’d really like to share, but in the end, we do have a business to run and have to keep netting

positive. I hope you understand.

What is the optimal configuration?

RJ45 ethernet cable from home router to Taiko router and DAC cable from Taiko router to switch is

optimal. Further improved performance can be obtained by powering both Taiko router and switch

from a single DC power supply using the Taiko DC distributor. Then there’s even more to be gained

by using the upcoming battery supply.

Is there any benefit in using SFP+ over SFP cable?

SFP = 1G

SFP+ = 10G

We supply SFP+. We did not compare the two but the expectation is that they will perform the

same.

What is the master clock frequency of the Taiko router and switch?

25MHz.

Since routers and Access Points generate noise, polluting our home electrical grid network no

matter how many audiophile routers/switches we use for our hi-fi system, I wonder if you could

share some configurations or experience that can reduce this type of interference.

Unfortunately, we cannot provide fixed recommendations as this highly varies between routers,

environment, and connected devices. In general, modern routers automatically adjust parameters

while they attempt to provide good quality connections to all devices. They can for example

automatically increase transmission power to increase the connection quality to a distant device

which can in turn can generate more noise. So, the situation could occur where 2 APs with good

combined coverage sum to less noise than a single one struggling to maintain good quality

connections.

Why is there no power indicator LED on the Router?

Alas, we cannot add a power LED or a network status LED to the Router because they negatively

affect the noise spectrum and the shielding.

Can you recommend a router for the general home network? It is my understanding you still need

a main network router from which the Taiko router will get its data.

Fritzbox has great routers. At taiko HQ, we use a Unifi dream machine pro and are satisfied with

that, but this has no integrated wifi. Unifi also has cheaper models with integrated wifi.

Have you found that running Qobuz was better on a different DNS than comcast (75.75.75.75)?

Some members on WBF are also mentioning improved sound with certain modems. The intent is

to maximize the sound quality through streaming.

The router really creates an isolated secondary network where all parameters are controlled by it.

We have not managed to find any meaningful differences with preceding equipment, modems,

routers etc. However, they can still "pollute" your mains over their power supplies which is not

something we can solve.

Wifi Antenna Experiments

We’re currently experimenting with different antennas with some interesting results. Where

conventional audiophile "wisdom" would have you think a smaller antenna is better, that is in fact

not necessarily true, as what happens is that a smaller antenna may need more transmitter power

which in turn increases noise. The same really goes for 2.4G vs 5G Wi-Fi, 5G needs more transmitter

power due to its shorter range which is most likely the actual cause of the notion that 5G is bad for

SQ. Evidence currently points towards SQ being mainly impacted by a combination of antenna to

device connection quality and the transmitter power this requires. We're going to optimize this for

optimal in room performance.

What about antenna size and signal strength?

I don't know much about the subject, but shouldn't the antenna be a fraction of the wavelength (1/2,

1/4, etc.)? The wavelength corresponding to 2.4 Ghz is roughly 12 cm, which would give antennas of

6, 3, 2 cm. And so on. There also seems to be a relation between antenna length and directivity, not

to mention impedance. In short, I can imagine that it won't be easy to choose, as all this will

ultimately have an impact on sound. It'll be interesting to hear how you arrived at your final choice.

Purely by listening or/and on more practical criteria?

The antenna will be very low power as it now consumes less power than a single RJ45 network port.

We expect minimal differences as the radio transmitter power is set to manual and there will be only

one Wi-Fi device. But we’ll see!

Did you try a non-omni directional antenna, like a beam antenna?

We have a few tests left to perform, but yes clearly there is some directivity involved.

Have you evaluated any sound quality difference between the F connector and a BNC connector?

We did not try BNC and should add that due to this particular Wi-Fi solution being virtually inaudible

already, especially when able to stick to the lowest possible transmission power, might make

discerning differences in connectors used near impossible.

Wifi versus Wired or Cable versus Wireless

We have come to believe that there will not be a general consensus because of differing sensitivities

to different types of noise and/or noise bands an individual may have, and to complicate this

further, the sensitivity of their system setup and components to this. Another aspect related to Wi-Fi

is we don't allow the transmitter to automatically increase transmission power.

Are jitter and latency a result of, or related to, power consumption?

Although lower latency equipment can use more power, we believe there is no real correlation.

Processor Selection

or military grade hardware is something (ab)used in Hi-Fi to create an aura of specialty so we are

hesitant to use this kind of terminology, but we do use a military grade security processor. The

reason for this is this type of processor is security hardened to an excessive degree, you may or may

not be aware that DATA can be stolen / reconstructed by measuring fluctuations in processor / data

line emissions and power draw. The processor & subsystem we use has constant emissions and

power draw, no fluctuations. This is the highest obtainable security standard, which we arguably not

need, but the constant power draw and emissions are excellent for audio. This means that data

transmission does not translate into altering EMI and/or powerline disturbances. This very likely

changes the expected outcome of parameter influences on sound quality relative to network gear

which lacks this type of extreme security hardening.

Is Airplay functionality support via the Taiko router still on the cards?

Yes, but further down the road.

Interactive FAQ section

For an easier way to find answers to your questions please see the interactive Richpanel FAQ Section

on Taikoaudio.com

FAQs TAP0016 User manual

Brand: FAQs

Model: TAP0016

Type: User manual

FAQs TAP0016

Download PDF

report

FAQs TAP0016 User manual

FAQs TAP0016 User manual

Other documents