SUNLITE® Technical Guide
98
4. “Roong & Cladding” Installation Method
This is a simpler, more practical method, resembling the one used for single-wall, corrugated plastic (or metal) sheets. It employs
longer strips, with wider dimension. Length is as long as possible without excess deformation by thermal expansion. SUNLITE sheets
are laid on top of the purlins, with rib channels directed down the slope, perpendicular to the
purlins. Span between purlins is determined by the load and deection characteristics
of the specic SUNLITE sheet.
1. The sheets are connected to each other by long connecting elements.
2. The wide variety of these connection methods falls into two main
categories: “wet” or “dry” installation systems. The connecting elements
(made of aluminum, sheet metal or plastic- rigid PVC or polycarbonate) are
designed as connectors, not as load supporting members. They connect the
sheets to each other, achieving one unied watertight exterior shell. Additional
strength and rigidity achieved through them is an added bonus.
Basic inverted “H” polycarbonate connecting prole
An old and simple form enabling a lengthwise (side by side) connection between twin/
multi-wall sheets. It is sometime oered with a specic size prole for each sheet thickness, or in versatile, more exible design enabling
the use of one prole with 2 consecutive thicknesses (4-6 & 8-10 “H” proles). This connecting method is practically inappropriate for
the thicker SUNLITE panels.
1. “Dry” method: The edges on both sides are inserted into the prole, holding
the sheets by “dry” mechanical friction, with the sheets on both sides fastened
to the structure, along the purlins, by xing screws, about 500-600 mm (20-24
inches) apart.
2. “Wet” method: both the prole channels are half-lled with silicone, which
acts, after installation and curing, both as sealer and adhesive. It may oer
better weatherproong at shallower slopes, than the “dry” system, but is very dicult to install properly and cleanly (Figure 7).
Notes:
1. The connector itself is not xed to the purlins.
2. Both systems are basic and disclose several shortcomings: dicult and bothersome installation, plain looks, weak and imperfect
connection and sealing. Installation may prove to be lengthy and messy for inexperienced hands. They are, however, considered the
cheapest.
Two-part polycarbonate connecting prole, which is made of the following:
1. A lower base prole, usually the more rigid of the two, on which the edges of the adjoining sheets are placed. Usually the base
prole is fastened to the purlins by screws through the middle, with both edges free, letting the sheets slide easily due to the thermal
expansion and contraction process.
2. The upper part, usually more exible than the base, clips on the base prole by hand pressure, holding both sides of the adjoining
sheets in place by mechanical pressure.
This type is easier to install, more reliable in holding the sheets and sealing the connection. It is used, mostly, in “dry” installation, but
could be assisted by silicone on the upper and lower prole. “Wet” installation like this is dicult to keep clean during installation and
with long sheets may lose its eectiveness due to excessive expansion.
Figure 6
Figure 7
Basic, inverted H polycarbonate connecting prole
Figure 8
Drawing of typical two-part polycarbonate connecting proles currently used
Figure 8a Figure 8b Figure 8c