2009 Industrial Wireless Guidebook
Differentiating Between Wireless Technologies
1
4G Status
With respect to integration, 4G technologies involve more participants, technologies, industries, and
applications than just telecommunications. It can, therefore, be applied to finance, medicine, education,
transportation, and other industries. This is because the communication terminal is able to manage more
tasks, such as multimedia communications, remote control, and voice communications. If area networks,
Internet, telecommunications, radio broadcasts, and satellites are grouped together as an integrated
network in the future regardless of the terminal used, they will be able to offer complete wireless and
broadband connectivity and higher quality service. Such advancement would allow 4G technologies to
penetrate every aspect of our lives.
From the subscribers’ perspective, 4G is able to provide faster speed and satisfy more needs. The
fundamental driving force of moving mobile communications from analog to digitalization and from 2G
to 4G is the shift from wireless voice service to wireless multimedia service in subscriber needs. This has
spurred operators to adapt because they need to boost ARPU, develop new frequencies to attract more
subscribers, design more efficient spectrum use, and cut their operational costs.
In effect, 4G involves two different but overlapping concepts:
• High-speed mobile telephony system with speed as fast as ADSL’s bandwidth (10 Mbps or higher). This
concept formerly applied to wireless technologies such as Wi-Fi. It is also the vision addressed by the
successful 3G system providers presently.
• Pervasive network technology, a more abstract term often dened as wireless technology that is
“ubiquitous, ambient, and everywhere,” can involve subscribers in the system completely. Wi-Fi or the
system implemented in the future may be applied. This concept also includes Smart Radio technology
and has higher spectrum use and transmission capability. Moreover, it can also filter and transmit large
volumes of information.
Table: 4G Technology Comparison
Technology LTE UMB WiMax
Standards Setting Organization RTSI QCom Intel
Original Tech. WCDMA CDMA2000 1xEV-DO ---
Maximum Speed 100Mbps, 50Mbps 288Mbps, 75Mbps 70Mbps, 70Mbps
Wireless Tech. OFDM/MIMO/SC-FDMA MIMO/SDMA MIMO/SOFDMA
Schedule 2008 draft 2009 2008
Despite WiMax’s current lead in commercializing its technologies, there are signs indicating that LTE is
catching up. In the past, major players like Nokia, Siemens, Motorola, Alcatel, Lucent, and Nortel showed
their support for WiMax. But starting from 2008, these players were also showing signs of interests in LTE.
Nortel had announced not to take part in Mobile WiMax. Alcatel, Lucent, and Motorola also started to
discuss LTE, announcing they will take part in both WiMax and LTE development. This has been interpreted
as an indication that WiMax development has fallen short of their expectations.
The turning point came with the abandonment of Ultra Mobile Broadband, UMB. When the leading mobile
chip provider Qualcomm announced that it will not to invest in UMB but in LTE instead, the CDMA camp
also decided to adopt LTE as its standard for next generation technologies. The unification of both CDMA
and GSM in LTE gives LTE a great advantage over WiMax.
However, LTE is not expected to dominate the market any time soon. This is because current 3G
technologies have raised HSPA+ downlink speed to 42 Mbps. With 100 Mbps possible in the near future
with HSPA, LTE will need to offer even more incentives to operators in order for it to become the industry
standard.